Who set up the log? How many parameters are you logging?

 

This is going to be very interesting....

 

This is the latest data log I had sent to the tuner to their request (not specifically for the fueling) just for them to review after loading the tune which is why I suspect so many channels. There are 2 pages of channels going. @ catmonkey.. the 94.5% cycle makes sense to me.. this was the first time I tried to review a log and not just blindly send back to the tuner. I figured I had no clue what I looking for, thank you

 

With a large number of channels open, it can skew certain data because of the refresh rate. I have more experience with the SCT product, Live Link, so I'm not sure what's going on in the log as to the duty cycle calculation. However, the PW duty cycle calculation is solid, if the PW data is correct. That's not a lot of head room if you regularly use E85. A nice crisp day with good air and you could see a higher duty cycle.

 

 

Always go big fuel on corn.

 

I’m aggravated with myself for not doing enough research prior and the company I purchased the package from. I feel like someone should’ve said “if you’re going to run E85 or add more mods down the line, I would recommend bigger injectors that we also sell. I would’ve gladly paid the additional $700. But too late for that. Lesson learned

 

I don't think you'd be that far behind in having to upgrade the fuel system beyond that, so it would be even more cost. There is a market for used 1050X injectors, however.

 

You could always just keep the max RPM down too. Have your tuner set the shift point closer to the factory 7,500?

 

That is for sure an option, I don’t even like shifting it that high anyways. But I was asked to by the tuner for the log.

 

Less RPM gives the injector more time to be open, thus lowering your injector duty cycle. Or at least that's my naive understanding of it. 7,500 RPM limit would put you around 87% duty cycle if my math is correct. I think I'd rather keep the current smaller 2.7 pulley but rev the engine less so you still benefit from the increased power and torque down low.

 

I like where your heads at, I’m plenty good with a 7,500 Redline. This would also allow me to keep the corn. The only 2 additional mods I want to do over the winter is the VMP Apex lid/IC brick.

 

It is possible those mods could add enough horsepower and need to increase the pulsewidth out of the injector, so it would be wise to log the result. If you're adding the lid, it might not be a bad time to swap out the injectors, but will need a tune revision for the injector parameters.

 

I am debating on just going back to 93. I wasn’t able to get a dyno pull in this year so I could compare the two, but to be honestly wasn’t overly impressed with the corn at least how it felt driving.

 

Just noticed your fuel trims are crazy. STFT's are pretty consistent but super high (adding fuel). Normally you'd want to see within 5% correction. LTFT's are crazy too, and not consistent bank to bank. Did your tuner say anything about this? I'm a novice and could 100% be missing something here but it did surprise me.

 

No, they didn’t say anything needing adjusted or mention anything was off. It was said everything looked good on the reply from that log. I can send the whole log if anyone were interested instead of just looking at a snapshot.